Policy Positions

1. Family Justice & Child Wellbeing

 

Position

Family justice systems must integrate trauma-informed and coercive-control–aware practices, particularly in cases involving domestic abuse, high-conflict custody, and migrant families.
 

Identified Structural Issues

Across survivor-led accounts and research, recurring issues include:

• Trauma responses misinterpreted as instability, hostility, or non-cooperation

• Overreliance on narrative consistency and emotional presentation as credibility markers

• Inappropriate use of mediation where a power imbalance or coercive control exists

• Insufficient weighting of children’s psychological safety and stress exposure

• Limited cultural and migration-context awareness in assessments

 

Procedural fairness alone does not guarantee child safety.

 

Policy Directions

Soulful Phoenix supports:

• Mandatory trauma-informed and coercive-control training for family court professionals

• Clear safeguards limiting mediation in cases involving abuse or power asymmetry

• Child-impact assessments that extend beyond legal timelines and formal compliance

• Recognition of trauma-related communication patterns in credibility assessments

• Access to language-appropriate and culturally informed expert input

​

2. Trauma-Informed Interpretation of Behavior

 

Position

Behavior displayed under trauma should be contextualized, not moralized or pathologized.

 

Identified Structural Issues

Survivors are often evaluated on how they present rather than what they have experienced. This includes:

• Emotional expression being interpreted as unreliability

• Hypervigilance framed as paranoia

• Protective behaviors reframed as obstruction or hostility

• Silence or withdrawal interpreted as lack of cooperation

 

These interpretations risk replicating abusive dynamics within institutional settings.

 

Policy Directions

Soulful Phoenix supports:

• Trauma-aware behavioral interpretation guidelines across justice and welfare systems

• Reduced reliance on affect-based credibility judgments

• Greater use of contextual and longitudinal assessment rather than snapshot evaluations

• Recognition that trauma responses are adaptive, not indicative of character flaws

 

3. Migrant Women, Custody, and Structural Power Imbalance

 

Position

Migration status compounds vulnerability in family justice systems and must be treated as a structural factor, not an individual deficit.

 

Identified Structural Issues

Migrant mothers often face:

• Language and cultural barriers in legal and psychological processes

• Reduced access to informal advocacy or family networks

• Heightened scrutiny of parenting under unfamiliar norms

• Fear of institutional consequences that limit disclosure

When migration context is ignored, neutrality becomes asymmetrical.

 

Policy Directions

Soulful Phoenix supports:

• Guaranteed access to language-appropriate information and support

• Cultural-context awareness in parenting and custody evaluations

• Safeguards against punitive interpretations linked to migration-related stress

• Recognition of isolation and dependency as risk factors rather than moral failings

 

4. Financial Access & Entrepreneurship After Abuse

 

Position

Financial systems must recognize economic abuse and survival-driven disruption when assessing risk, creditworthiness, and entrepreneurial potential.

 

Identified Structural Issues

Survivors of abuse—particularly migrant women—often present:

• Interrupted employment or business histories

• Debt incurred under coercion or constrained choice

• Limited access to guarantors or informal capital

• Risk patterns shaped by survival, not irresponsibility

Standard risk models frequently penalize these realities without contextual review.

 

Policy Directions

Soulful Phoenix supports:

• Trauma-aware credit assessment frameworks

• Contextual evaluation of disrupted financial histories

• Recognition of economic abuse in risk profiling

• Public or EU-backed funding mechanisms designed for survivor-led entrepreneurship

• Separation of survival-driven debt from character-based risk assumptions

 

5. Mental Health Access & Preventive Care

 

Position

Mental health systems must move beyond crisis-only responses and invest in preventive, culturally responsive psychosocial support.

 

Identified Structural Issues

Migrant women frequently encounter:

• Long waiting lists for publicly funded care

• Limited English-language or culturally competent services

• Over-medicalization of trauma without addressing structural stressors

• Inaccessibility of non-clinical, preventive mental health support

 

Endurance is often mistaken for resilience—until collapse occurs.

 

Policy Directions

Soulful Phoenix supports:

• Investment in preventive, community-based psychosocial care

• Language-accessible and culturally responsive mental health pathways

• Clear distinction between trauma response and psychiatric pathology

• Integration of mental health considerations into family justice processes

 

6. Use of Lived Experience in Policy Design

 

Position

Lived experience must be treated as qualitative evidence, not anecdotal bias.

 

Identified Structural Issues

Policy development often excludes survivor insight or relegates it to consultation without impact.

This creates blind spots where procedural design diverges from real-world effect.

 

Policy Directions

Soulful Phoenix supports:

• Structured inclusion of survivor-informed input in policy evaluation

• Ethical frameworks for using lived experience without retraumatization

• Transparent feedback loops showing how experiential insight informs reform

• Safeguards against tokenization of survivor voices

 

 

Our Stance on Accountability

Soulful Phoenix does not advocate for blame-based reform.

We advocate for impact-aware accountability:

• Systems are responsible for how they function in real lives

• Good intentions do not negate harmful outcomes

• Refinement is a strength, not an admission of failure

 

 

How These Positions Are Used

These policy positions inform:

• Written policy briefs and white papers

• Parliamentary and institutional outreach

• Consultations with NGOs and civil society actors

• Public-facing advocacy and education

They are living positions, reviewed as evidence and context evolve.